Minerva and I subjected ourselves to George Clooney's Murrow/Friendly anti-wh/WH (witch hunt/White House) parable
Good Night, and Good Luck last night. We used as our excuse that this was (sadly) the most palatable movie to play at Cleveland Park's majestic Uptown Theater -- which is also across the street from a great sushi spot -- in some time.
Writer/Director/Co-Star Clooney, whose once-promising career is increasingly and unfortunately resembling that of fork-stuck Harrison Ford, clearly wants us all to know that he's a good Democrat and student of history and the arts.
Clooney attempts to equate morally and ideologically the many genuinely horrifying elements of President Bush's war on terror with the tactics employed in the early 1950s by the anti-communist nut job and House Un-American Committee chair Sen. Joseph McCarthy. Clooney's
modus operandi, if you catch his drift -- and he wants
desperately for you to catch his drift -- is to mimic the tack of playright Arthur Miller, who deftly cut the legs out from McCarthy in his 1953 play
The Crucible.
But Clooney the writer (to paraphrase Lloyd Bentsen) is no Arthur Miller (or Elmore Leonard). Dr. Doug Ross's dialogue is wayward and lacking punch. Oftentimes actors speak over one another in that annoying Aaron Sorkin kind of way, though their words are elocuted in a manner stereoptyical of TV in/about the 1950s. Think
The West Wing starring Joe Friday. Not pretty.
The characters are undeveloped. None shine. The only serviceable role the film offers up is for lead David Strathairn, who does an adequate (if paper-thin) Murrow. Clooney is lifeless as Friendly, a man who must have had
some courageous moments during such trying times.
Wasted especially is Robert Downey Jr. -- the best actor in most any movie he's in -- as Joe Wershba. Every story arc involving Downey trails off to a dull...
Clooney's directing is first-time, not first-rate. His lens, like the script, goes in and out of focus seemingly at random. The movie is shot in an often murky black-and-white, rather than what would have made more sense -- color interspersed with actual b&w newsreel footage of characters like McCarthy.
What Arthur Miller did in targeting Sen. McCarthy was brilliant, subtle, caustic and daring. Clooney's film is none of those things. While it's easy to assume Clooney made the film to criticize President Bush -- although Clooney's gone so far afield as to say it's meant to target
"dumb" people like Ann Coulter -- the end result comes off as more of a misguided attack on today's
climate, a message much more partisan and much less effective than that of Miller.
After all, our present-day witch hunt against suspected and rumored enemies -- or people the government simply doesn't like or feels like investigating -- was orchestrated as much by Democrats as Republicans. If one party is looking in the rear-view mirror and seeing a pile of people it's helped run over with, for example, the PATRIOT Act, that party should advocate not to blame others but to change the law.
But that's clearly too much to ask. Case in point: last night several people in the spartan crowd cheered at times during and
en (small)
masse at the end of the film. Why, when the best thing about it was clearly Minerva having splurged on a box of Raisinets?
I don't know, but I imagine these are the same people who watch
Lifetime so they can well up with tears about the clearly defined roles of one segment of society as oppressor and another as victim. Films like
Good Night help people who need to feel better about themselves do just that. A daub of the eyes is all these folks need to sleep well -- knowing their highly stylized version of their place in history is so right and that of their opponents so wrong.
Good night, shades of gray, and good luck, posterity.
Labels: Film